H would be for the Horns of Hammerad as a whole I think, considering it was used in V1 when they entered the dungeon, and arguably Ceria wasn’t the main protagonist of that group then.

I thought H was Half-elf

Anti-christ, haha anti(nium)-christ, get it?

It is not about retribution nor even equity (at least not directly) but conviction, remorse and repentance. If the Board of Pardons & Paroles can appreciate that distinction, any omniscient deity certainly can too. What people struggle with is not so much infinity as ETERNITY, because eternal existence precludes change (cf. Parmenides.) Hence when Moses asks Gods name the reply is simply, “I am that I am,” James can say, “Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, and comes down from the Father of lights, with whom there is no variation or shadow of turning. Of His own will He brought us forth by the word of truth, that we might be a kind of firstfruits of His creatures,” which incidentally covers the capacity of those condemned to Hell for eternity. The real question is how that leaves room for what we are experiencing now, but growing evidence suggests that time may be a purely human contrivance.

There is a huge difference in that everyone in heaven WANTS to be there, else they would not be. As for letting the punishment fit the crime, that is qualitative rather than quantitative, because it is not the particular act that is the problem; after all, the exact same act can be beneficial OR detrimental depending on the circumstances. The question is not whether one checks every box on an admissions list and/or avoid checking any on a rejection list, but where ones heart is: That is the point Jesus made about the semantic pedantic legalism and hypocrisy within the Jewish church at the time. It is a Boolean value; there are no magnitudes to consider, only true or false.

The thing to appreciate is that any god worthy of the title is necessarily flawless; that is a prerequisite. Admitting any imperfection would therefore just as necessarily make that god an imperfect god, which proves by contradiction that no god, as such, can accept the presence of evil. This is why the various “balance scale” views of the hereafter are so problematic: How many orphanages must one fund to “earn a free murder”? Where is our cutoff point; is it 51%? Is that fair to the person whose acts were 51% good OR the one whose acts were 49% good, and what happens to the people EXACTLY 50/50?

It is all about choice. Heaven would be excruciating for those who do not wish to be there, because any god abiding there would be obliged to annihilate the evil within them, which would in turn find the very presence of any god abhorrent even if left alone. And, again, what we are referring to as “evil” is simply utter rejection of any god: No one who feels that way would choose a gods company for the rest of eternity, so they are duly granted their choice–but those who feel it “better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven” should understand that that is the ultimate DIY project, since no unpleasant reminders of Gods stubbornly persistent existence, even in the form of divinely endowed reason, sensation, consciousness etc. I conceive of it as a coma patient in a sensory deprivation tank forever, the sole blessing being how little one is aware of ones absent surroundings. But everyone there or the other place goes by choice. People can leave Heaven any time they like (e.g. Satan and a third of the heavenly host purportedly did so) but the primary admission requirement is never WANTING to leave.

Since i cant edit my comment, to put it in perspective: . Even if someone killed every person on earth, there would eventually be a point where punishment would reach its limit. Let’s say 100 years per life (much higher than the average life expectancy). That would be 800 billion years of punishment. An incredible amount of time, but literally a blink of the eye in comparison to infinity.